The direct effect of EU directives: Fresh controversy or a storm in a teacupReportar como inadecuado


The direct effect of EU directives: Fresh controversy or a storm in a teacup


The direct effect of EU directives: Fresh controversy or a storm in a teacup - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Publication Date: 2014-12

Journal Title: European Law Review

Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell

Volume: 39

Pages: 850-862

Language: English

Type: Article

Metadata: Show full item record

Citation: Albors-Llorens, A. (2014). The direct effect of EU directives: Fresh controversy or a storm in a teacup?. European Law Review, 39 850-862.

Description: This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Sweet & Maxwell.

Abstract: The judgment of the Court of Justice in Portgás v Ministério da Agricultura, do Mar, do Ambiente e do Ordenamento do Território can be read as adding a new twist to the drawn-out saga on the direct effect of unimplemented directives in EU law. It essentially concludes that a defaulting State can enforce a non-implemented directive against one of its own emanations. Thus, it can be construed as endorsing a new type of direct effect that might be classified as “intermediate” horizontal direct effect. However, the Court reached that conclusion using a rationale based on the duty to ensure the effective implementation of directives that binds the Member States and without explicitly recognising the existence of a new direct effect dimension. This comment evaluates the potential repercussions of the judgment.

Identifiers:

This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251076

Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales

Licence URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/





Autor: Albors-Llorens, Albertina

Fuente: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251076



DESCARGAR PDF




Documentos relacionados