Opinions delivered by the commissioners in the principal cases. To which is prefixed a copy of the conventions between the two governments and of the rules of the commission. Reportar como inadecuado




Opinions delivered by the commissioners in the principal cases. To which is prefixed a copy of the conventions between the two governments and of the rules of the commission. - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

32 Ciencia política - Political science

Be it known that the undersigned, commissioners, appointed, respectively, by the president of the United States of America and the government of the United States of Venezuela, in pursuance of the convention between said countries for a reopening of the claims of citizens of the Unites States against Venezuela under the treaty on april 25, 1866, concluded at Washington December 5, 1885.

Tipo de documento: Libro - Book

Palabras clave: Convention, Government of United States of America, Government of the United States of Venezuela

Temática: 3 Ciencias sociales - Social sciences 32 Ciencia política - Political science9 Geografía e Historia - History and geography 98 Historia general de América del Sur - History of ancient world; of specific continents, countries, localities; of extraterrestrial worlds





Fuente: http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co


Introducción



U NlTIW THE STATES AND CO)[~IlSSJ()N. Vl ;NEZlELL-N 158 ness, Dr.
Felipe Fermin de Paul is appointed to temporarily ad as attorney for hil~, kevpiug in miud that it appears hom the record of the proceedings that this latter lms couuselh-d and assisted him in the pJacdillg instance.- 7, 1887, Supreme Court for the case letters rogatory so-called to the United States District nt Philiulolphia, JUlie the issued Court -He lllesting that notice be given to a certain Jacob Idler, residing in the city of Phi luclel plria (the SOil of Jacob Idler), that he he and appear by himself or by his utt.oruey hefore the said Supreme Court.
of Veuezuelu at the city of Caracas, within seventy davs, ill a certain .Ina iusti tuted or promoted against him II) the fiscnl attoruey of the said H.elJublic for the reversal or restitutio n.
in inteqro of n sentence or decree given in his favor and against the treasury of Veuezuela. The nol.ico uctuallv reached 1(11er only twelve days before the e x.pirutiou of the tiuic limited for his appearance, when there were uo iueuns of reaching Venezuela in time. He did 1I0t appoal, or authorize .my one to appear for him in the v •. ,J case. Ih e Supreme Court for the ease rendered ;L decision, No-,(-11l her 4, 1837, 011 said application, .Ieuyiug its ullowance for wunt of origin;tl jurisdiction to glallt the remedy. It held: 0; .:,. .,:- -This Supreme Court has, therefore.
renclied the eouclusiou that the right and 1)0-))(-, to gmnt the remedy of 1-;stitlltio in intcqrum, in the first iustauce, dO-8 not belong to it.
Law ~l, til.
25,Pnrlirl,t Third; provides that the action, by which the nullification of a jndicial clecision, through tile remedy of JestitntiIJ iii integllllll. is fougilt for.
must he bronght before the same judge who rendered the judgment The juez de tetras of this city was the one who reuder--d the decision ag-illst which the remedy of )II,ditlitiO in integrum is no-- iuvobld, and the Super...






Documentos relacionados