False-Name Manipulation in Weighted Voting Games is Hard for Probabilistic Polynomial TimeReport as inadecuate



 False-Name Manipulation in Weighted Voting Games is Hard for Probabilistic Polynomial Time


False-Name Manipulation in Weighted Voting Games is Hard for Probabilistic Polynomial Time - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Download or read this book online for free in PDF: False-Name Manipulation in Weighted Voting Games is Hard for Probabilistic Polynomial Time
False-name manipulation refers to the question of whether a player in a weighted voting game can increase her power by splitting into several players and distributing her weight among these false identities. Analogously to this splitting problem, the beneficial merging problem asks whether a coalition of players can increase their power in a weighted voting game by merging their weights. Aziz et al. ABEP11 analyze the problem of whether merging or splitting players in weighted voting games is beneficial in terms of the Shapley-Shubik and the normalized Banzhaf index, and so do Rey and Rothe RR10 for the probabilistic Banzhaf index. All these results provide merely NP-hardness lower bounds for these problems, leaving the question about their exact complexity open. For the Shapley-Shubik and the probabilistic Banzhaf index, we raise these lower bounds to hardness for PP -probabilistic polynomial time-, and provide matching upper bounds for beneficial merging and, whenever the number of false identities is fixed, also for beneficial splitting, thus resolving previous conjectures in the affirmative. It follows from our results that beneficial merging and splitting for these two power indices cannot be solved in NP, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, which is considered highly unlikely.



Author: Anja Rey; Jörg Rothe

Source: https://archive.org/







Related documents