The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policyReportar como inadecuado

The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Health Research Policy and Systems

, 14:4

First Online: 14 January 2016Received: 13 March 2015Accepted: 04 December 2015DOI: 10.1186-s12961-015-0069-9

Cite this article as: Makkar, S.R., Turner, T., Williamson, A. et al. Health Res Policy Sys 2015 14: 4. doi:10.1186-s12961-015-0069-9


BackgroundEvidence-informed policymaking is more likely if organisations have cultures that promote research use and invest in resources that facilitate staff engagement with research. Measures of organisations’ research use culture and capacity are needed to assess current capacity, identify opportunities for improvement, and examine the impact of capacity-building interventions. The aim of the current study was to develop a comprehensive system to measure and score organisations’ capacity to engage with and use research in policymaking, which we entitled ORACLe Organisational Research Access, Culture, and Leadership.

MethodWe used a multifaceted approach to develop ORACLe. Firstly, we reviewed the available literature to identify key domains of organisational tools and systems that may facilitate research use by staff. We interviewed senior health policymakers to verify the relevance and applicability of these domains. This information was used to generate an interview schedule that focused on seven key domains of organisational capacity. The interview was pilot-tested within four Australian policy agencies. A discrete choice experiment DCE was then undertaken using an expert sample to establish the relative importance of these domains. This data was used to produce a scoring system for ORACLe.

ResultsThe ORACLe interview was developed, comprised of 23 questions addressing seven domains of organisational capacity and tools that support research use, including 1 documented processes for policymaking; 2 leadership training; 3 staff training; 4 research resources e.g. database access; and systems to 5 generate new research, 6 undertake evaluations, and 7 strengthen relationships with researchers. From the DCE data, a conditional logit model was estimated to calculate total scores that took into account the relative importance of the seven domains. The model indicated that our expert sample placed the greatest importance on domains 2, 3 and 4.

ConclusionWe utilised qualitative and quantitative methods to develop a system to assess and score organisations’ capacity to engage with and apply research to policy. Our measure assesses a broad range of capacity domains and identifies the relative importance of these capacities. ORACLe data can be used by organisations keen to increase their use of evidence to identify areas for further development.

KeywordsAssessment Capacity Discrete choice experiments Evidence Health policy Knowledge translation Measure Organisation Policymaker Research Research use Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-s12961-015-0069-9 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF

Autor: Steve R Makkar - Tari Turner - Anna Williamson - Jordan Louviere - Sally Redman - Abby Haynes - Sally Green - Sue Brennan


Documentos relacionados