Low level lead exposure and pregnancy outcomes in an observational birth cohort study: dose–response relationshipsReport as inadecuate

Low level lead exposure and pregnancy outcomes in an observational birth cohort study: dose–response relationships - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

BMC Research Notes

, 9:291

Public Health


BackgroundNational and international guidelines on safe levels for blood Pb in pregnancy focus on a threshold above which exposure is of concern. However, it has recently been suggested that the decrease in birth weight per unit increase in blood Pb is actually greater at lower than at higher concentrations of Pb without evidence of a lower threshold of effect. Our aim was to investigate whether there was evidence for a differential effect of maternal Pb levels on birth outcomes and-or a threshold value for effects.

MethodsBlood samples from pregnant women enrolled in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children ALSPAC were analysed. Data collected on the infants included anthropometric variables. We fitted adjusted multivariable fractional polynomial models for birth outcomes.

ResultsAdjusted models that assumed a linear relationship between untransformed blood Pb and the outcomes provided the best fit: an increase of 1 µg-dl was associated with changes in birth weight of −9.93 95 % CI −20.27, 0.41 g, head circumference −0.03 95 % CI −0.06, 0.00 cm and crown–heel length −0.05 95 % CI −0.10, 0.00 cm.

ConclusionThere was no evidence in this study to suggest a supralinear dose–response relationship or a lower threshold for the effect of maternal blood Pb on birth outcomes. This has implications for consideration of national and international guidelines on levels of concern in pregnancy. Exposure to Pb should be kept as low as possible during pregnancy to minimise adverse outcomes.

KeywordsALSPAC Lead Pregnancy Birth outcomes Dose–response AbbreviationsALSPACAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

B-Pbblood lead level

Download fulltext PDF

Author: Caroline M. Taylor - Kate Tilling - Jean Golding - Alan M. Emond

Source: https://link.springer.com/

Related documents