A comparative analysis of a disposable and a reusable pedicle screw instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis: integrating HTA and MCDAReportar como inadecuado

A comparative analysis of a disposable and a reusable pedicle screw instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis: integrating HTA and MCDA - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Health Economics Review

, 7:17

First Online: 03 May 2017Received: 20 October 2016Accepted: 06 April 2017DOI: 10.1186-s13561-017-0153-7

Cite this article as: Ottardi, C., Damonti, A., Porazzi, E. et al. Health Econ Rev 2017 7: 17. doi:10.1186-s13561-017-0153-7


ObjectiveLumbar arthrodesis is a common surgical technique that consists of the fixation of one or more motion segments with pedicle screws and rods. However, spinal surgery using these techniques is expensive and has a significant impact on the budgets of hospitals and Healthcare Systems. While reusable and disposable instruments for laparoscopic interventions have been studied in literature, no specific information exists regarding instrument kits for lumbar arthrodesis. The aim of the present study was to perform a complete health technology assessment comparing a disposable instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis innovative device with the standard reusable instrument.

MethodsA prospective and observational study was implemented, by means of investigation of administrative records of patients undergoing a lumbar arthrodesis surgical procedure. The evaluation was conducted in 2013, over a 12- month time horizon, considering all the procedures carried out using the two technologies. A complete health technology assessment and a multi-criteria decision analysis approach were implemented in order to compare the two alternative technologies. Economic impact with the implementation of an activity based costing approach, social, ethical, organisational, and technology-related aspects were taken into account.

ResultsAlthough the cost analysis produced similar results in the comparison of the two technologies total cost equal to € 4,279.1 and € 4,242.6 for reusable instrument kit and the disposable one respectively, a significant difference between the two instrument kits was noted, in particular concerning the organisational impact and the patient safety.

ConclusionsThe replacement of a reusable instrument kit for lumbar arthrodesis, with a disposable one, could improve the management of this kind of devices in hospital settings.

KeywordsLumbar arthrodesis Multi-criteria decision analysis Health technology assessment Reusable instrument Disposable instrument Italy AbbreviationABCActivity Based Costing Analysis

BIABudget Impact Analysis

CEACost-Effectiveness Analysis

CEVCost-Effectiveness Value

HTAHealth Technology Assessment

MCDAMulti-Criteria Decision Analysis

Autor: Claudia Ottardi - Alessio Damonti - Emanuele Porazzi - Emanuela Foglia - Lucrezia Ferrario - Tomaso Villa - Enrico Aimar -

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/

Documentos relacionados