Evaluating multifunctionality and adaptive capacity of mountain forest management alternatives under climate change in the Eastern AlpsReportar como inadecuado

Evaluating multifunctionality and adaptive capacity of mountain forest management alternatives under climate change in the Eastern Alps - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

European Journal of Forest Research

pp 1–19

First Online: 05 May 2017Received: 26 August 2016Revised: 17 April 2017Accepted: 19 April 2017DOI: 10.1007-s10342-017-1051-6

Cite this article as: Irauschek, F., Rammer, W. & Lexer, M.J. Eur J Forest Res 2017. doi:10.1007-s10342-017-1051-6


Future provisioning of ecosystem services ES from mountain forests is uncertain due to potential impacts of climate change. For a case study catchment in the Eastern Alps in Austria we analysed how management and climate change may affect the provisioning of four ES timber production, carbon sequestration, biodiversity and bird habitat quality, and protection against gravitational hazards. We used the PICUS forest ecosystem model to project seven management alternatives that differed with regard to cutting pattern size SLIT, PATCH, STRIP and two harvesting intensity levels in terms of return interval under historic climate and five transient climate change scenarios over 100 years. In addition no management and sanitary management were simulated. In total twelve indicators were linked to model output to quantify ES provisioning. Results under historic climate showed increased volume and carbon stocks in low-intensity management, while high-intensity management decreased stocks. Bird habitat quality was maintained only by low-intensity management using SLIT and PATCH cuts. In particular rockfall protection decreased strongly under the STRIP cut scenario. Improved tree growth in warming scenarios was counterbalanced by increasing damage from bark beetle disturbances. Canopy openings and increased deadwood supply from disturbances partly fostered bird habitat quality in no-management alternatives. Overall none of the management alternatives performed best for all ES. PATCH and SLIT regimes at currently practiced low intensity appeared as compromise to achieve multifunctionality at small scale. As involved trade-offs among ES can be substantial, partial segregation with priority on specific services in designated zones is recommended.

KeywordsMountain forest management Ecosystem services Multifunctionality Climate change Simulation Communicated by Harald Bugmann.

This article originates from the conference -Mountain Forest Management in a Changing World-, held 7–9 July 2015 in Smokovec, High Tatra Mountains, Slovakia.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1007-s10342-017-1051-6 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Autor: Florian Irauschek - Werner Rammer - Manfred J. Lexer

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/

Documentos relacionados