Calculating hospital length of stay using the Hospital Episode Statistics; a comparison of methodologiesReportar como inadecuado

Calculating hospital length of stay using the Hospital Episode Statistics; a comparison of methodologies - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Health Services Research

, 17:347

Quality, performance, safety and outcomes


BackgroundAccurate calculation of hospital length of stay LOS from the English Hospital Episode Statistics HES is important for a wide range of audit and research purposes. The two methodologies which are commonly used to achieve this differ in their accuracy and complexity. We compare these methods and make recommendations on when each is most appropriate.

MethodsWe calculated LOS using continuous inpatient spells CIPS, which link care spanning across multiple hospitals, and spells, which do not, for six conditions with short dyspepsia or other stomach function, ENT infection, medium dehydration and gastroenteritis, perforated or bleeding ulcer, and long stroke, fractured proximal femur average LOS. We examined how inter-area comparisons i.e. benchmarking and temporal trends differed. We defined a classification system for spells and explored the causes of differences.

ResultsStroke LOS was 16.5 days using CIPS but 24% 95% CI: 23, 24 lower, at 12.6 days, using spells. Smaller differences existed for shorter-LOS conditions including dehydration and gastroenteritis 4.5 vs. 4.2 days and ENT infection 0.9 vs. 0.8 days. Typical patient pathways differed markedly between areas and have evolved over time. One area had the third shortest stroke LOS out of 151 using spells but the fourth longest using CIPS. These issues were most profound for stroke and fractured proximal femur, as patients were frequently transferred to a separate hospital for rehabilitation, however important disparities also existed for conditions with simpler secondary care pathways e.g. ENT infections, dehydration and gastroenteritis.

ConclusionsSpell-based LOS is widely used by researchers and national reporting organisations, including the Health and Social Care Information Centre, however it can substantially underestimate the time patients spend in hospital. A widespread shift to a CIPS methodology is required to improve the quality of LOS estimates and the robustness of research and benchmarking findings. This is vital when investigating clinical areas with typically long, complex patient pathways. Researchers should ensure that their LOS calculation methodology is fully described and explicitly acknowledge weaknesses when appropriate.

KeywordsLength of stay Hospitals Methods AbbreviationsACSCAmbulatory care sensitive condition

CCGClinical commissioning group

CIPSContinuous inpatient spells

ENTEar, nose and throat

FCEFinished consultant episode

HESHospital episode statistics

HSCICHealth and social care information centre

LOSLength of stay

NHSNational health service

PCTPrimary care trust

Autor: John Busby - Sarah Purdy - William Hollingworth


Documentos relacionados