Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variablesReport as inadecuate




Prediction of whole-body fat percentage and visceral adipose tissue mass from five anthropometric variables - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Background

The conventional measurement of obesity utilises the body mass index BMI criterion. Although there are benefits to this method, there is concern that not all individuals at risk of obesity-associated medical conditions are being identified. Whole-body fat percentage %FM, and specifically visceral adipose tissue VAT mass, are correlated with and potentially implicated in disease trajectories, but are not fully accounted for through BMI evaluation. The aims of this study were a to compare five anthropometric predictors of %FM and VAT mass, and b to explore new cut-points for the best of these predictors to improve the characterisation of obesity.

Methods

BMI, waist circumference WC, waist-to-hip ratio WHR, waist-to-height ratio WHtR and waist-height0.5 WHT.5R were measured and calculated for 81 adults 40 women, 41 men; mean SD age: 38.4 17.5 years; 94% Caucasian. Total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry with Corescan GE Lunar iDXA, Encore version 15.0 was also performed to quantify %FM and VAT mass. Linear regression analysis, stratified by sex, was applied to predict both %FM and VAT mass for each anthropometric variable. Within each sex, we used information theoretic methods Akaike Information Criterion; AIC to compare models. For the best anthropometric predictor, we derived tentative cut-points for classifying individuals as obese >25% FM for men or >35% FM for women, or > highest tertile for VAT mass.

Results

The best predictor of both %FM and VAT mass in men and women was WHtR. Derived cut-points for predicting whole body obesity were 0.53 in men and 0.54 in women. The cut-point for predicting visceral obesity was 0.59 in both sexes.

Conclusions

In the absence of more objective measures of central obesity and adiposity, WHtR is a suitable proxy measure in both women and men. The proposed DXA-%FM and VAT mass cut-offs require validation in larger studies, but offer potential for improvement of obesity characterisation and the identification of individuals who would most benefit from therapeutic intervention.



Author: Michelle G. Swainson , Alan M. Batterham, Costas Tsakirides, Zoe H. Rutherford, Karen Hind

Source: http://plos.srce.hr/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents