Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled TrialReport as inadecuate




Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

International Journal of Telemedicine and ApplicationsVolume 2011 2011, Article ID 540138, 13 pages

Research Article

University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Received 31 May 2011; Revised 16 August 2011; Accepted 31 August 2011

Academic Editor: Trevor Russell

Copyright © 2011 Kathryn H. Bowles et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure HF costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department ED use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days 16% versus 19% and over six months 46% versus 52% were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency.





Author: Kathryn H. Bowles, Alexandra L. Hanlon, Henry A. Glick, Mary D. Naylor, Melissa O-Connor, Barbara Riegel, Nai-Wei Shih, and

Source: https://www.hindawi.com/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents