The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial PRIMEReportar como inadecuado




The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial PRIME - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Background

Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria mRDTs have been scaled-up widely across Africa. The PRIME study evaluated an intervention aiming to improve fever case management using mRDTs at public health centers in Uganda.

Methods

A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010–13 in Tororo, a high malaria transmission setting. Twenty public health centers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. The intervention included training in health center management, fever case management with mRDTs, and patient-centered services; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether-lumefantrine AL when stocks ran low. Three rounds of Interviews were conducted with caregivers of children under five years of age as they exited health centers N = 1400; reference mRDTs were done in children with fever N = 1336. Health worker perspectives on mRDTs were elicited through semi-structured questionnaires N = 49 and in-depth interviews N = 10. The primary outcome was inappropriate treatment of malaria, defined as the proportion of febrile children who were not treated according to guidelines based on the reference mRDT.

Findings

There was no difference in inappropriate treatment of malaria between the intervention and control arms 24.0% versus 29.7%, adjusted risk ratio 0.81 95% CI: 0.56, 1.17 p = 0.24. Most children 76.0% tested positive by reference mRDT, but many were not prescribed AL 22.5% intervention versus 25.9% control, p = 0.53. Inappropriate treatment of children testing negative by reference mRDT with AL was also common 31.3% invention vs 42.4% control, p = 0.29. Health workers appreciated mRDTs but felt that integrating testing into practice was challenging given constraints on time and infrastructure.

Conclusions

The PRIME intervention did not have the desired impact on inappropriate treatment of malaria for children under five. In this high transmission setting, use of mRDTs did not lead to the reductions in antimalarial prescribing seen elsewhere. Broader investment in health systems, including infrastructure and staffing, will be required to improve fever case management.



Autor: Clare I. R. Chandler, Emily L. Webb, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Susan Nayiga, Christine Nabirye, Deborah D. DiLiberto, Emmanuel

Fuente: http://plos.srce.hr/



DESCARGAR PDF




Documentos relacionados