Comparison of Different Anthropometric Measurements and Inflammatory BiomarkersReport as inadecuate

Comparison of Different Anthropometric Measurements and Inflammatory Biomarkers - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

International Journal of InflammationVolume 2012 2012, Article ID 124693, 5 pages

Research ArticleDepartments of Cardiology and Internal Medicine “D” and “E”, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 62439, Israel

Received 8 February 2012; Accepted 6 March 2012

Academic Editor: Juan Carlos Kaski

Copyright © 2012 Yaron Arbel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction. Different anthropometric variables have been shown to be related to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to compare the association between different anthropometric measurements and inflammatory status. Methods and results. A cross-sectional study design in which we analyzed the data collected during a five-year period in the Tel Aviv Medical Center Inflammation Survey TAMCIS. Included in the study were 13,033 apparently healthy individuals at a mean SD age of 43. Of these, 8,292 were male and 4,741 female. A significant age-adjusted and multiple-adjusted partial correlation was noted between all anthropometric measurements and all inflammatory biomarkers. There was no significant difference in the correlation coefficients between different biomarkers and anthropometric variables. Conclusion. Most of the common used anthropometric variables are similarly correlated with inflammatory variables. The clinician can choose the variable that he-she finds easiest to use.

Author: Yaron Arbel, Edo Y. Birati, Itzhak Shapira, Talya Finn, Shlomo Berliner, and Ori Rogowski



Related documents