Relationship between knowledge, stereotyping, and prejudice in interethnic communication Reportar como inadecuado




Relationship between knowledge, stereotyping, and prejudice in interethnic communication - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 2012, 10 1

Autor: Jonathan Matusitz

Fuente: http://www.redalyc.org/


Introducción



PASOS.
Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural ISSN: 1695-7121 info@pasosonline.org Universidad de La Laguna España Matusitz, Jonathan Relationship between Knowledge, Stereotyping, and Prejudice in Interethnic Communication PASOS.
Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, vol.
10, núm.
1, enero, 2012, pp.
89-98 Universidad de La Laguna El Sauzal (Tenerife), España Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=88123053008 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Vol.
10 Nº 1 págs.
89-98.
2012 www.pasosonline.org Relationship between Knowledge, Stereotyping, and Prejudice in Interethnic Communication Jonathan Matusitz i University of Central Florida ( USA) Abstract: This study describes, analyzes, critiques, and synthesizes four theories pertaining to interethnic communication: the contact hypothesis, Anxiety-Uncertainty Management Theory, Cultural Theory, and the White Racial Identity Development Model.
All center on the relationship between knowledge, stereotyping, and prejudice.
What is valuable about those theories is that they attempt to integrate communication into a perspective on cultural, behavioral, social, interactional, and developmental transformations.
What the four theories have in common is that the understanding and development of healthy interethnic relations and flexible interactions require a high degree of ingroup communication and, at the same time, an equally high degree of out-group communication. To corroborate the major arguments put forward in this study, relevant research studies (and the methodological underpinnings thereof) are analyzed.
Three levels of knowledge (highest level of knowledge, middle level of knowledge, and lowest level of knowledge) are also compared in an attempt...





Documentos relacionados