Associations between Perceptions of Drinking Water Service Delivery and Measured Drinking Water Quality in Rural AlabamaReport as inadecuate




Associations between Perceptions of Drinking Water Service Delivery and Measured Drinking Water Quality in Rural Alabama - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

1

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, 300 Hackberry Lane, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA

2

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

3

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, 245 7th Avenue, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA

4

Barge Waggoner Sumner and Cannon Inc., 2047 West Main Street, Suite 1, Dothan, AL 36301, USA

5

Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3995, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA





*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.



Abstract Although small, rural water supplies may present elevated microbial risks to consumers in some settings, characterizing exposures through representative point-of-consumption sampling is logistically challenging. In order to evaluate the usefulness of consumer self-reported data in predicting measured water quality and risk factors for contamination, we compared matched consumer interview data with point-of-survey, household water quality and pressure data for 910 households served by 14 small water systems in rural Alabama. Participating households completed one survey that included detailed feedback on two key areas of water service conditions: delivery conditions intermittent service and low water pressure and general aesthetic characteristics taste, odor and color, providing five condition values. Microbial water samples were taken at the point-of-use from kitchen faucets and as-delivered from the distribution network from outside flame-sterilized taps, if available, where pressure was also measured. Water samples were analyzed for free and total chlorine, pH, turbidity, and presence of total coliforms and Escherichia coli. Of the 910 households surveyed, 35% of participants reported experiencing low water pressure, 15% reported intermittent service, and almost 20% reported aesthetic problems taste, odor or color. Consumer-reported low pressure was associated with lower gauge-measured pressure at taps. While total coliforms TC were detected in 17% of outside tap samples and 12% of samples from kitchen faucets, no reported water service conditions or aesthetic characteristics were associated with presence of TC. We conclude that consumer-reported data were of limited utility in predicting potential microbial risks associated with small water supplies in this setting, although consumer feedback on low pressure—a risk factor for contamination—may be relatively reliable and therefore useful in future monitoring efforts. View Full-Text

Keywords: small water supply; rural; water quality; perceived service; drinking water quality; infrastructure; environmental health small water supply; rural; water quality; perceived service; drinking water quality; infrastructure; environmental health





Author: Jessica C. Wedgworth 1, Joe Brown 2, Pauline Johnson 3, Julie B. Olson 1, Mark Elliott 3, Rick Forehand 4 and Christine E. Stauber 5,*

Source: http://mdpi.com/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents