Learning to prescribe – pharmacists experiences of supplementary prescribing training in EnglandReportar como inadecuado

Learning to prescribe – pharmacists experiences of supplementary prescribing training in England - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Medical Education

, 8:57

First Online: 05 December 2008Received: 27 May 2008Accepted: 05 December 2008


BackgroundThe introduction of non-medical prescribing for professions such as pharmacy and nursing in recent years offers additional responsibilities and opportunities but attendant training issues. In the UK and in contrast to some international models, becoming a non-medical prescriber involves the completion of an accredited training course offered by many higher education institutions, where the skills and knowledge necessary for prescribing are learnt. Aims: to explore pharmacists- perceptions and experiences of learning to prescribe on supplementary prescribing SP courses, particularly in relation to inter-professional learning, course content and subsequent use of prescribing in practice.

MethodsA postal questionnaire survey was sent to all 808 SP registered pharmacists in England in April 2007, exploring demographic, training, prescribing, safety culture and general perceptions of SP.

ResultsAfter one follow-up, 411 51% of pharmacists responded. 82% agreed SP training was useful, 58% agreed courses provided appropriate knowledge and 62% agreed that the necessary prescribing skills were gained. Clinical examination, consultation skills training and practical experience with doctors were valued highly; pharmacology training and some aspects of course delivery were criticised. Mixed views on inter-professional learning were reported – insights into other professions being valued but knowledge and skills differences considered problematic. 67% believed SP and recent independent prescribing IP should be taught together, with more diagnostic training wanted; few pharmacists trained in IP, but many were training or intending to train. There was no association between pharmacists- attitudes towards prescribing training and when they undertook training between 2004 and 2007 but earlier cohorts were more likely to be using supplementary prescribing in practice.

ConclusionPharmacists appeared to value their SP training and suggested improvements that could inform future courses. The benefits of inter-professional learning, however, may conflict with providing profession-specific training. SP training may be perceived to be an instrumental -stepping stone- in pharmacists- professional project of gaining full IP status.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1472-6920-8-57 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF

Autor: Richard J Cooper - Joanne Lymn - Claire Anderson - Anthony Avery - Paul Bissell - Louise Guillaume - Allen Hutchinson - El

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/

Documentos relacionados