The consent solution to punishment and the explicit denial objection Reportar como inadecuado




The consent solution to punishment and the explicit denial objection - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 2010, 25 2

Autor: Miroslav IMBRISEVIC

Fuente: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=339730812008


Introducción



THEORIA.
Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia ISSN: 0495-4548 theoria@ehu.es Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea España IMBRISEVIC, Miroslav The Consent Solution to Punishment and the Explicit Denial Objection THEORIA.
Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, vol.
25, núm.
2, 2010, pp.
211224 Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea Donostia-San Sebastián, España Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=339730812008 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative The Consent Solution to Punishment and the Explicit Denial Objection* Miroslav IMBRISEVIC Recibido: 21.2.2010 Versión final: 22.03.2010 BIBLID [0495-4548 (2010) 25: 68; pp.
211-224] ABSTRACT: Recently, David Boonin has put forward several objections to Carlos S.
Ninos Consensual Theory of Punishment.
In this paper I will defend Nino against the explicit denial objection.
I will discuss whether Boonins interpretation of Nino as a tacit consent theorist is right.
I will argue that the offenders consent is neither tacit nor express, but a special category of implicit consent.
Further, for Nino the legal-normative consequences of an act (of crime) are irrevocable, i.e.
one cannot (expressly and successfully) deny liability to them.
I will suggest an explanation for Ninos irrevocability claim. Keywords: Carlos S.
Nino, consensual theory of punishment, explicit denial objection, tacit consent, irrevocability. 1.
Introduction The foremost proponent of the consent solution to the justification of punishment was the Argentinian legal scholar Carlos Santiago Nino (1943-1993).
The important feature of Ninos theory of punishment is that the wrong-doer, by committing an illegal ...





Documentos relacionados