Tuomas tahko 2015 an introduction to metametaphysics. cambridge: cambridge university press. Report as inadecuate




Tuomas tahko 2015 an introduction to metametaphysics. cambridge: cambridge university press. - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 2017, 52

Author: Paniel Osberto Reyes Cárdenas

Source: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323049780017


Teaser



Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía ISSN: 0188-6649 kgonzale@up.edu.mx Universidad Panamericana México Reyes Cárdenas, Paniel Osberto Tuomas Tahko (2015) An Introduction to Metametaphysics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía, núm.
52, 2017, pp.
463-466 Universidad Panamericana Distrito Federal, México Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=323049780017 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Reseñas 463 Tuomas Tahko (2015) An Introduction to Metametaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. This new book of Tuomas Tahko opens a relatively untouched arena of the philosophical range of disciplines, one that has come to be called “metametaphysics” or otherwise known as “meta-ontology”.
This introduction is more than needed! Even philosophers tiptoe in these matters, as the debate holds a very high level of complexity and it is easy to feel confused and downfall in the apparent oddity of the type of examples and theories that there are.
This is why Tuomas Tahko helps the reader by having a very didactic introduction that guides us in the deep waters of the metaphysics that has resulted of years of lively debate within the analytic tradition.
The term ‘metametaphysics’, however, cries for clarification: can we legitimate, at all, talking of metaphysics after the criticisms against the discipline itself offered by early critics? Or should we not reformulate these problems by throwing away the old terminology? Here as elsewhere, getting rid of the baby with the bathtub is a constant temptation: we should care about metaphysics (and metametaphysics) because we are interested in answering what there is. We are too required to carry this task in a systematic and...





Related documents