Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in EnglandReportar como inadecuado

Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Patient Safety in Surgery

, 9:2

First Online: 23 January 2015Received: 04 November 2014Accepted: 17 December 2014


BackgroundWide variation in the outcomes of colorectal surgery persists, despite a well-established evidence-base to inform clinical practice. This variation may be attributed to differences in quality of care, but we do not know what this means in practical terms of care delivery. This telephone interview study aimed to identify distinguishing characteristics in the organisation of care among colorectal units with the best length of stay results in England.

MethodsTen English National Health Service hospitals were identified with the shortest length of stay after elective colonic surgery between January 2011 and December 2012. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a senior colorectal surgeon and ward nurse, who were not informed of their performance, at each site. Audio recordings were professionally transcribed and thematically analysed for similarities and differences in practice between units.

ResultsAll ten short length of stay units approached agreed to participate, and 19 of 20 interviews were recorded. These units standardised clinical care based upon an Enhanced Recovery Program. Beyond this, they organised the clinical team to efficiently and reliably deliver this package of care, with the majority of day-to-day care delivered by consultants and nurses. Patients were closely monitored for postoperative deterioration, using a combination of early warning scores, nurses’ clinical judgement and regular senior medical review. Of note, operative volume and laparoscopy rates in these units were not statistically significantly different from the national average p = 0.509 and p = 0.131, respectively. The postoperative analgesic strategy varied widely between units, from routine epidural use to local anaesthetic infiltration or patient-controlled analgesia.

ConclusionsThe Enhanced Recovery Program may be seen as necessary but not sufficient to achieve the best length of stay results. In the study units, consultants and nurses led and delivered the majority of patient care on the ward. High quality teamwork helped detect and resolve clinical issues promptly, with nurses empowered to contact consultants directly if needed. Other units may learn from these teams by adopting protocol-based, consultant- or nurse-delivered care, and by improving coordination and communication between consultants and ward nurses.

KeywordsColorectal surgery Enhanced recovery Length of stay Outcomes Interviews Quality Performance AbbreviationsNHSNational Health Service

ERASEnhanced recovery after surgery

ERPEnhanced recovery protocol

LLoSLong length of stay

HESHospital Episode Statistics

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-s13037-014-0050-5 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF

Autor: Ben E Byrne - Anna Pinto - Paul Aylin - Alex Bottle - Omar D Faiz - Charles A Vincent

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5

Documentos relacionados