Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung MassesReportar como inadecuado

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Central Mediastinal Lung Masses - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic EndoscopyVolume 2013 2013, Article ID 150492, 6 pages

Clinical Study

Gastroenterology Service, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, 28801 Madrid, Spain

Gastroenterology Service, University Hospital Quiron, Madrid, Spain

Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Received 26 March 2013; Accepted 11 May 2013

Academic Editor: Kazuo Inui

Copyright © 2013 Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10-2004 to 12-2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 85% patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient 1-62 = 1.6% had a benign lung mass hamartoma, while the remaining 61 patients 61-62 = 98.4% had a malignant mass primary lung cancer: 55-61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6-61 = 10%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax 1-62 = 1.6%. Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.

Autor: Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J. Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel

Fuente: https://www.hindawi.com/


Documentos relacionados