Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesisReport as inadecuate

Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

BMC Public Health

, 13:756

Chronic Disease epidemiology


BackgroundGovernments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physical activity, and the extent to which these attitudes vary with characteristics of a the targeted behaviour b the intervention and c the respondents.

MethodsWe searched electronic databases and conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical studies that reported public attitudes in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand towards interventions relating to tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity. Two hundred studies met the inclusion criteria.

ResultsOver half the studies 105-200, 53% were conducted in North America, with the most common interventions relating to tobacco control 110-200, 55%, followed by alcohol 42-200, 21%, diet-related interventions 18-200, 9%, interventions targeting both diet and physical activity 18-200, 9%, and physical activity alone 3-200, 2%. Most studies used survey-based methods 160-200, 80%, and only ten used experimental designs.

Acceptability varied as a function of: a the targeted behaviour, with more support observed for smoking-related interventions; b the type of intervention, with less intrusive interventions, those already implemented, and those targeting children and young people attracting most support; and c the characteristics of respondents, with support being highest in those not engaging in the targeted behaviour, and with women and older respondents being more likely to endorse more restrictive measures.

ConclusionsPublic acceptability of government interventions to change behaviour is greatest for the least intrusive interventions, which are often the least effective, and for interventions targeting the behaviour of others, rather than the respondent him or herself. Experimental studies are needed to assess how the presentation of the problem and the benefits of intervention might increase acceptability for those interventions which are more effective but currently less acceptable.

KeywordsHealth behaviour Attitude Public opinion Policy  Download fulltext PDF

Author: Stephanie Diepeveen - Tom Ling - Marc Suhrcke - Martin Roland - Theresa M Marteau


Related documents