Maybe his blood is still strong-: a qualitative study among HIV-sero-discordant couples on ART in rural UgandaReport as inadecuate

Maybe his blood is still strong-: a qualitative study among HIV-sero-discordant couples on ART in rural Uganda - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

BMC Public Health

, 12:801

Infectious Disease epidemiology


BackgroundHIV-negative members of sero-discordant couples are at high risk for HIV acquisition but few behavioral prevention interventions have been implemented in sub-Saharan Africa and discordance is not well understood by couples themselves.

MethodsIn this nested sub-study, we interviewed 40 HIV sero-discordant couples before and after a 6-month behavioral intervention that was comprised of four group discussions on specific HIV prevention and care topics. The content of the sessions included: 1 understanding HIV serodiscordance and reducing risk, 2 couple communication, 3 reproductive health and HIV serodiscordance, 4 coping with HIV serodiscordance and ongoing support. Couple members were interviewed individually. Data were analyzed thematically using ‘Framework Analysis’ which incorporated dyadic factors to address couple issues.

ResultsAnalysis revealed pre-identified concepts and emergent themes that were relevant to the final conceptual model. Four major categories of factors affecting couple relations, beliefs and current risk behaviors emerged: intervention factors, structural-contextual factors, physical health factors, and past risk behavior. The topics within the intervention most relevant were communication and reproductive health. The contextual factors highlighted by couples were gender norms around sexual decision-making and multiple partnerships. Individual beliefs regarding HIV serodiscordance persisted over all time points for some couples. Interestingly, some couple members had divergent views about their HIV status; some believing the HIV-negative member was negative while others described multiple beliefs around the negative member’s blood surely being positive for HIV. Couple communication emerged as an important theme mediating beliefs and behavior.

ConclusionsIn addition to biomedical and behavioral interventions, HIV-serodiscordant couple interventions must embrace the contextual complexity and cultural understanding of HIV infection and discordance as well as the dynamic nature of couple communication to influence risk behavior.

KeywordsHIV Prevention Uganda Discordant couples Positive prevention HIV-infected persons Prevention with positives Africa Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1471-2458-12-801 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF

Author: Rachel King - Nafuna Wamai - Kenneth Khana - Eva Johansson - Pille Lindkvist - Rebecca Bunnell


Related documents