The development and validation of an urbanicity scale in a multi-country studyReportar como inadecuado

The development and validation of an urbanicity scale in a multi-country study - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Public Health

, 12:530

Biostatistics and methods


BackgroundAlthough urban residence is consistently identified as one of the primary correlates of non-communicable disease in low- and middle-income countries, it is not clear why or how urban settings predispose individuals and populations to non-communicable disease NCD, or how this relationship could be modified to slow the spread of NCD. The urban–rural dichotomy used in most population health research lacks the nuance and specificity necessary to understand the complex relationship between urbanicity and NCD risk. Previous studies have developed and validated quantitative tools to measure urbanicity continuously along several dimensions but all have been isolated to a single country. The purposes of this study were 1 To assess the feasibility and validity of a multi-country urbanicity scale; 2 To report some of the considerations that arise in applying such a scale in different countries; and, 3 To assess how this scale compares with previously validated scales of urbanicity.

MethodsHousehold and community-level data from the Young Lives longitudinal study of childhood poverty in 59 communities in Ethiopia, India and Peru collected in 2006-2007 were used. Household-level data include parents’ occupations and education level, household possessions and access to resources. Community-level data include population size, availability of health facilities and types of roads. Variables were selected for inclusion in the urbanicity scale based on inspection of the data and a review of literature on urbanicity and health. Seven domains were constructed within the scale: Population Size, Economic Activity, Built Environment, Communication, Education, Diversity and Health Services.

ResultsThe scale ranged from 11 to 61 mean 35 with significant between country differences in mean urbanicity; Ethiopia 30.7, India 33.2, Peru 39.4. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis and high corrected item-scale correlations suggest good internal consistency. High agreement was observed between this scale and a dichotomized version of the urbanicity scale Kappa 0.76; Spearman’s rank-correlation coefficient 0.84 p < 0.0001. Linear regression of socioeconomic indicators on the urbanicity scale supported construct validity in all three countries p < 0.05.

ConclusionsThis study demonstrates and validates a robust multidimensional, multi-country urbanicity scale. It is an important step on the path to creating a tool to assess complex processes like urbanization. This scale provides the means to understand which elements of urbanization have the greatest impact on health.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1471-2458-12-530 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF

Autor: Nicole L Novak - Steven Allender - Peter Scarborough - Douglas West


Documentos relacionados