Explaining variation in Down’s syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviewsReport as inadecuate

Explaining variation in Down’s syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

BMC Health Services Research

, 14:437

Health policy, reform, governance and law


BackgroundThe offer of prenatal Down’s syndrome screening is part of routine antenatal care in most of Europe; however screening uptake varies significantly across countries. Although a decision to accept or reject screening is a personal choice, it is unlikely that the widely differing uptake rates across countries can be explained by variation in individual values alone.

The aim of this study was to compare Down’s syndrome screening policies and programmes in the Netherlands, where uptake is relatively low <30% with England and Denmark where uptake is higher 74 and > 90% respectively, in an attempt to explain the observed variation in national uptake rates.

MethodsWe used a mixed methods approach with an embedded design: a documentary analysis and b expert stakeholder analysis. National central statistical offices and legal documents were studied first to gain insight in demographic characteristics, cultural background, organization and structure of healthcare followed by documentary analysis of primary and secondary sources on relevant documents on DSS policies and programme. To enhance interpretation of these findings we performed in-depth interviews with relevant expert stakeholders.

ResultsThere were many similarities in the demographics, healthcare systems, government abortion legislation and Down’s syndrome screening policy across the studied countries. However, the additional cost for Down’s syndrome screening over and above standard antenatal care in the Netherlands and an emphasis on the ‘right not to know’ about screening in this country were identified as potential explanations for the ‘low’ uptake rates of Down’s syndrome screening in the Netherlands. The social context and positive framing of the offer at the service delivery level may play a role in the relatively high uptake rates in Denmark.

ConclusionsThis paper makes an important contribution to understanding how macro-level demographic, social and healthcare delivery factors may have an impact on national uptake rates for Down’s syndrome screening. It has suggested a number of policy level and system characteristics that may go some way to explaining the relatively low uptake rates of Down’s syndrome screening in the Netherlands when compared to England and Denmark.

KeywordsDown’s syndrome Antenatal screening Utilization of healthcare Uptake International comparison Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1472-6963-14-437 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neeltje MTH Crombag, Ynke E Vellinga, Sandra A Kluijfhout, Louise D Bryant, Pat A Ward, Rita Iedema-Kuiper, Peter CJI Schielen, Jozien M Bensing, Gerard HA Visser, Ann Tabor and Janet Hirst contributed equally to this work.

Download fulltext PDF

Author: Neeltje MTH Crombag - Ynke E Vellinga - Sandra A Kluijfhout - Louise D Bryant - Pat A Ward - Rita Iedema-Kuiper - Peter

Source: https://link.springer.com/

Related documents