Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitalsReportar como inadecuado




Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Health Services Research

, 14:495

Quality, performance, safety and outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundHospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve the prediction of health outcomes and reduce confounding in inter-hospital comparisons. The objective of the study is to compare the performance of two multivariate risk adjustment models, with and without clinical data and drug prescription information, in terms of their capability to a predict short-term outcome rates and b compare hospitals’ risk-adjusted outcome rates using two risk-adjustment procedures.

MethodsObservational, retrospective study based on hospital data collected at the regional level.

Two cohorts of patients discharged in 2010 from hospitals located in the Lazio Region, Italy: acute myocardial infarction AMI and hip fracture HF. Multivariate logistic regression models were implemented to predict 30-day mortality AMI or 48-hour surgery HF, adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities plus clinical data and drug prescription information. Risk-adjusted outcome rates were derived at the hospital level.

ResultsThe addition of clinical data and drug prescription information improved the capability of the models to predict the study outcomes for the two conditions investigated. The discriminatory power of the AMI model increases when the clinical data and drug prescription information are included c-statistic increases from 0.761 to 0.797; for the HF model the increase was more slight c-statistic increases from 0.555 to 0.574. Some differences were observed between the hospital-adjusted proportion estimated using the two different models. However, the estimated hospital outcome rates were weakly affected by the introduction of clinical data and drug prescription information.

ConclusionsThe results show that the available clinical variables and drug prescription information were important complements to the hospital discharge data for characterising the acute severity of the patients. However, when these variables were used for adjustment purposes their contribution was negligible. This conclusion might not apply at other locations, in other time periods and for other health conditions if there is heterogeneity in the clinical conditions between hospitals.

KeywordsClinical variables Drug prescription Administrative data Risk adjustment Outcome research Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-s12913-014-0495-3 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Paola Colais - Mirko Di Martino - Danilo Fusco - Marina Davoli - Paul Aylin - Carlo Alberto Perucci

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/







Documentos relacionados