Global postural reeducation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Reportar como inadecuado




Global postural reeducation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Rodrigo G. P. Barreto ; Caroline C. Robinson ; Rodrigo D. M. Plentz ; Marcelo F. Silva ;Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia 2016, 20 3

Autor: Giovanni E. Ferreira

Fuente: http://www.redalyc.org/


Introducción



Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia ISSN: 1413-3555 rbfisio@ufscar.br Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e PósGraduação em Fisioterapia Brasil Ferreira, Giovanni E.; Barreto, Rodrigo G.
P.; Robinson, Caroline C.; Plentz, Rodrigo D. M.; Silva, Marcelo F. Global Postural Reeducation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, vol.
20, núm.
3, mayo-junio, 2016, pp.
194-205 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia São Carlos, Brasil Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=235046376002 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative systematic review Global Postural Reeducation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Giovanni E.
Ferreira1, Rodrigo G.
P.
Barreto2, Caroline C.
Robinson3, Rodrigo D.
M.
Plentz1, Marcelo F.
Silva1 ABSTRACT | Objectives: To systematically review randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) on patient-reported outcomes in conditions of the musculoskeletal system.
Method: An electronic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and SciELO was performed from their inception to June 2015.
Randomized controlled trials that analyzed pain and patient-reported outcomes were included in this review.
The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate risk of bias, and the quality of evidence was rated following the GRADE approach.
There were no language restrictions.
Results: Eleven trials were included totaling 383 patients.
Overall, the trials had high risk of bias.
GPR was superior to no treatment but not to other forms of treatment for pa...





Documentos relacionados