A retrospective review of how nonconformities are expressed and finalized in external inspections of health-care facilitiesReportar como inadecuado




A retrospective review of how nonconformities are expressed and finalized in external inspections of health-care facilities - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Health Services Research

, 15:405

First Online: 23 September 2015Received: 21 February 2015Accepted: 14 September 2015DOI: 10.1186-s12913-015-1068-9

Cite this article as: Hovlid, E., Høifødt, H., Smedbråten, B. et al. BMC Health Serv Res 2015 15: 405. doi:10.1186-s12913-015-1068-9

Abstract

BackgroundExternal inspections are widely used in health care as a means of improving the quality of care. However, the way external inspections affect the involved organization is poorly understood. A better understanding of these processes is important to improve our understanding of the varying effects of external inspections in different organizations. In turn, this can contribute to the development of more effective ways of conducting inspections. The way the inspecting organization states their grounds for noncompliant behavior and subsequently follows up to enforce the necessary changes can have implications for the inspected organization’s change process. We explore how inspecting organizations express and state their grounds for noncompliant behavior and how they follow up to enforce improvements.

MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review, in which we performed a content analysis of the documents from 36 external inspections in Norway. Our analysis was guided by Donabedian’s structure, process, and outcome model.

ResultsDeficiencies in the management system in combination with clinical work processes was considered as nonconformity by the inspecting organizations. Two characteristic patterns were identified in the way observations led to a statement of nonconformity: one in which it was clearly demonstrated how deficiencies in the management system could affect clinical processes, and one in which this connection was not demonstrated. Two characteristic patterns were also identified in the way the inspecting organization followed up and finalized their inspection: one in which the inspection was finalized solely based on the documented changes in structural deficiencies addressed in the nonconformity statement, and one based on the documented changes in structural and process deficiencies addressed in the nonconformity statement.

ConclusionExternal inspections are performed to improve the quality of care. To accomplish this aim, we suggest that nonconformities should be grounded by observations that clearly demonstrate how deficiencies in the management system might affect the clinical processes, and that the inspection should be finalized based on documented changes in both structural and process deficiencies addressed in the nonconformity statement.

KeywordsExternal inspection Quality improvement Nonconformity Management system Clinical governance  Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Einar Hovlid - Helge Høifødt - Bente Smedbråten - Geir Sverre Braut

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/



DESCARGAR PDF




Documentos relacionados