Improving stroke patients care: a patient held record is not enoughReportar como inadecuado




Improving stroke patients care: a patient held record is not enough - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Health Services Research

, 1:1

First Online: 06 March 2001Received: 18 January 2001Accepted: 06 March 2001DOI: 10.1186-1472-6963-1-1

Cite this article as: Ayana, M., Pound, P., Lampe, F. et al. BMC Health Serv Res 2001 1: 1. doi:10.1186-1472-6963-1-1

Abstract

BackgroundStroke patients- care in hospital tends to be poorly organised, with poor communication and a lack of information being frequent sources of complaint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a patient-held record PHR would result in greater patient satisfaction and better care planning for stroke patients.

MethodsA time series control 6 months - intervention 8 months - control 6 months was used among London teaching hospital general medical and geriatric medicine inpatient wards. All stroke patients admitted to the wards during the intervention phase received a PHR and were instructed in its use. Demographic, stroke severity, social factors and outcomes were collected from all stroke patients during all phases of the study.

ResultsOf 252 stroke patients aged 46 to 98 years entered into the study, by six months after admission 118 46.8% had died. PHR and control group patients were well matched in terms of socio-demographic characteristics and pre-stroke ability. At six months after admission, 119 97% patients responded to the questionnaire. Just over half 56%, 13 of intervention group patients recalled receiving a PHR. Of those patients, 59% reported reading the PHR, 27% had lost their PHR, and two-thirds said they had difficulties encouraging staff to write in the PHR. Half felt that possession of the PHR was more trouble than it was worth. PHR group patients were more satisfied with the recovery they had made 79% vs. 59%, p=0.04, but felt less able to talk to staff about their problems 61% vs. 82%, p=0.02. PHR group patients reported receiving fewer explanations about their condition 18% vs. 33%, p=0.12 and treatment 26% vs. 45%, p=0.07, and were more afraid of asking doctors questions 21% vs. 4%, p=0.01 than controls. PHR group patients were no better prepared for hospital discharge than control group patients, and both groups were ill-informed about services and benefits that might have helped after discharge from hospital.

ConclusionsStroke patients received poor information and explanations regardless of whether they received a PHR. A PHR did not appear to improve patient satisfaction or discharge planning, and may have reduced opportunities for communication and explanation.

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Mulunish Ayana - Pandora Pound - Fiona Lampe - Shah Ebrahim

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/







Documentos relacionados