Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challengesReportar como inadecuado




Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Health Services Research

, 16:589

Organization, structure and delivery of healthcare

Abstract

BackgroundWe recently published a systematic review of different healthcare settings such as outpatient, community or home for administering intravenous chemotherapy, and concluded that performing conventionally designed randomised trials was difficult. The main problems were achieving adequate trial accrual rates and recruiting a study population which adequately represented the target population of interest. These issues stemmed from the fact that potential participants may have had pre-trial perceptions about the trial settings they may be allocated; such preferences will sometimes be strong enough for patients to decline an invitation to participate in a trial. A patient preference trial design in which patients can choose, or be randomised to, an intervention may have obviated these recruitment issues, although none of the trials used such a design.

MethodsIn order to gain a better understanding of the broader prevalence and extent of these preference issues and any other methodological challenges, we undertook an exploratory review of settings trials in any area of healthcare treatment research. We searched The Cochrane Library and Google Scholar and used snowballing methods to identify trials comparing different healthcare settings.

ResultsTrial accrual was affected by patient preferences for a setting in 15 of the 16 identified studies; birth setting trials were the most markedly affected, with between 68 % and 85 % of eligible women declining to participate specifically because of preference for a particular healthcare setting. Recruitment into substance abuse and chemotherapy setting studies was also notably affected by preferences. Only four trials used a preference design: the proportion of eligible patients choosing to participate via a preference group ranged from between 33 % and 67 %.

ConclusionsIn trials of healthcare settings, accrual may be seriously affected by patient preferences. The use of trial designs which incorporate a preference component should therefore strongly be considered. When designing such trials, investigators should consider settings to be complex interventions, which are likely to have linked components which may be difficult to control for. Careful thought is also needed regarding the choice of comparator settings and the most appropriate outcome measures to be used.

KeywordsHealthcare settings Service delivery Patient preference Preference trials Randomised trial AbbreviationsCONSORTConsolidated standards of reporting trials

GPGeneral practitioner

HSandDRHealth services and delivery research

ICCDIntermediate care clinics for diabetes

NHSNational health service

RCTRandomized controlled trial

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Mark S. Corbett - Judith Watson - Alison Eastwood

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/







Documentos relacionados