'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography.Reportar como inadecuado

'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Reference: Toye, F, Seers, K, Allcock, N et al., (2013). 'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography. BMC medical research methodology, 13 (1), 46.Citable link to this page:


'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. However, there is still no agreement as to whether, or how we should appraise studies for inclusion. We aimed to explore the intuitive processes that determined the 'quality' of qualitative research for inclusion in qualitative research syntheses. We were particularly interested to explore the way that knowledge was constructed. METHODS: We used qualitative methods to explore the process of quality appraisal within a team of seven qualitative researchers funded to undertake a meta-ethnography of chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain. Team discussions took place monthly between October 2010 and June 2012 and were recorded and transcribed. Data was coded and organised using constant comparative method. The development of our conceptual analysis was both iterative and collaborative. The strength of this team approach to quality came from open and honest discussion, where team members felt free to agree, disagree, or change their position within the safety of the group. RESULTS: We suggest two core facets of quality for inclusion in meta-ethnography - (1) Conceptual clarity; how clearly has the author articulated a concept that facilitates theoretical insight. (2) Interpretive rigour; fundamentally, can the interpretation 'be trusted?' Our findings showed that three important categories help the reader to judge interpretive rigour: (ii) What is the context of the interpretation? (ii) How inductive is the interpretation? (iii) Has the researcher challenged their interpretation? CONCLUSIONS: We highlight that methods alone do not determine the quality of research for inclusion into a meta-ethnography. The strength of a concept and its capacity to facilitate theoretical insight is integral to meta-ethnography, and arguably to the quality of research. However, we suggest that to be judged 'good enough' there also needs to be some assurance that qualitative findings are more than simply anecdotal. Although our conceptual model was developed specifically for meta-ethnography, it may be transferable to other research methodologies.

Peer Review status:Peer reviewedPublication status:PublishedVersion:Publisher's version Funder: NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research (HSandDR) programme   Notes:© 2013 Toye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Bibliographic Details

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.

Publisher Website: http://www.biomedcentral.com/

Journal: BMC medical research methodologysee more from them

Publication Website: http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedresmethodol/

Issue Date: 2013


Urn: uuid:0c78a205-c3d6-4ead-acee-83096f06872e

Source identifier: 401939

Eissn: 1471-2288

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-46

Issn: 1471-2288 Item Description

Type: Journal article;

Language: eng

Version: Publisher's versionKeywords: Humans Musculoskeletal Diseases Intuition Research Personnel Meta-Analysis as Topic Biomedical Research Qualitative Research Anthropology, Cultural Psychological Theory Decision Making Chronic Pain Quality Assurance, Health Care Tiny URL: pubs:401939


Autor: Toye, F - - - Seers, K - - - Allcock, N - - - Briggs, M - - - Carr, E - - - Andrews, J - - - Barker, K - institutionUniversity of

Fuente: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0c78a205-c3d6-4ead-acee-83096f06872e


Documentos relacionados