# Is More Ever Too Much: The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Is More Ever Too Much: The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Whether "more is ever too much" for the number of indicators (p) per factor (p/f) in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was studied by varying sample size (N) from 50 to 1,000 and p/f from 2 to 12 items per factor in 30,000 Monte Carlo simulations. For all sample sizes, solution behavior steadily improved (more proper solutions and more accurate parameter estimates) with increasing p/f. There was a compensatory relation between N and p/f; large p/f compensated for small N and large N compensated for small p/f, but large N and large p/f was best. A bias in the behavior of the chi square was also demonstrated where apparent fit declined with increasing p/f rations even though the models were all "true." Fit was similar for proper and improper solutions, as were parameter estimates from improper solutions not involving offending estimates. The 12-p/f data were also used to construct 2, 3, 4, or 6 parcels of items (e.g., 2 parcels of 6 items per factor, 3 parcels of 4 items per factor, etc.), but the 12-indicator (nonparceled) solutions were somewhat better behaved. The study shows that traditional "rules" implying fewer indicators should be used for smaller N may be inappropriate and that CFA researchers should use more indicators per factor than is evident in current practice. (Contains 4 figures, 5 tables, and 41 references.) (Author/SLD)

Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Factor Structure, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size, Simulation

Autor: **Marsh, Herbert A.; And Others**

Fuente: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=a&ft=on&ff1=dtySince_1992&pg=11692&id=ED401329