Greed and Grievance in Civil War.Reportar como inadecuado




Greed and Grievance in Civil War. - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Reference: Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, (2002). Greed and Grievance in Civil War. CSAE (University of Oxford).Citable link to this page:

 

Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Series: Working Papers

Abstract: May 2000 Of the 27 major armed conflicts that occurred in 1999, all but two took place within national boundaries. As an impediment to development, internal rebellion especially hurts the world's poorest countries. What motivates civil wars? Greed or grievance? Collier and Hoeffler compare two contrasting motivations for rebellion: greed and grievance. Most rebellions are ostensibly in pursuit of a cause, supported by a narrative of grievance. But since grievance assuagement through rebellion is a public good that a government will not supply, economists predict such rebellions would be rare. Empirically, many rebellions appear to be linked to the capture of resources (such as diamonds in Angola and Sierra Leone, drugs in Colombia, and timber in Cambodia). Collier and Hoeffler set up a simple rational choice model of greed-rebellion and contrast its predictions with those of a simple grievance model. Some countries return to conflict repeatedly. Are they conflict-prone or is there a feedback effect whereby conflict generates grievance, which in turn generates further conflict? The authors show why such a feedback effect might be present in both greed-motivated and grievance rebellions. The authors' results contrast with conventional beliefs about the causes of conflict. A stylized version of conventional beliefs would be that grievance begets conflict, which begets grievance, which begets further conflict. With such a model, the only point at which to intervene is to reduce the level of objective grievance. Collier and Hoeffler's model suggests that what actually happens is that opportunities for predation (controlling primary commodity exports) cause conflict and the grievances this generates induce dias-poras to finance further conflict. The point of policy intervention here is to reduce the absolute and relative attraction of primary commodity predation and to reduce the ability of diasporas to fund rebel movements. This paper - a product of the Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to study civil war and criminal violence. For more on this effort, go to www.worldbank.org/research/conflict. Paul Collier may be contacted at pcollier[at]worldbank.org

Bibliographic Details

Issue Date: 2002Identifiers

Urn: uuid:7c6ea647-eb62-4bb2-ba18-4267010e4913 Item Description

Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper;

Language: en

Relationships





Autor: Paul Collier - - - Anke Hoeffler - - - - Bibliographic Details Issue Date: 2002 - Identifiers Urn: uuid:7c6ea647-eb62-4bb2-ba18-4

Fuente: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7c6ea647-eb62-4bb2-ba18-4267010e4913



DESCARGAR PDF




Documentos relacionados