Are treatments more effective than placebos A systematic review and meta-analysis.Reportar como inadecuado

Are treatments more effective than placebos A systematic review and meta-analysis. - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Reference: Howick, J, Friedemann, C, Tsakok, M et al., (2013). Are treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 8 (5), e62599.Citable link to this page:


Are treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract: Background. Placebos are widely used in clinical practice in spite of ethical restrictions. Whether such use is justified depends in part on the relative benefit of placebos compared to ‘active’ treatments. A direct test for differences between placebo and ‘active’ treatment effects has not been conducted.Objectives. We aimed to test for differences between treatment and placebo effects within similar trial populations.Data Sources. A Cochrane Review compared placebos with no treatment in three-armed trials (no treatment, placebo, and treatment). We added an analysis of treatment and placebo differences within the same trials.Synthesis Methods. For continuous outcomes we compared mean differences between placebo and no treatment with mean differences between treatment and placebo. For binary outcomes we compared the risk ratio for treatment benefit (versus placebo) with the risk ratio for placebo benefit (versus no treatment). We conducted several preplanned subgroup analyses: objective versus subjective outcomes, conditions tested in three or more trials, and trials with varying degrees of bias.Results. In trials with continuous outcomes (n = 115) we found no difference between treatment and placebo effects (MD = −0.29, 95% CI −0.62 to 0.05, P = 0.10). In trials with binary outcomes (n = 37) treatments were significantly more effective than placebos (RRR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.61 to 0.86, P = 0.0003). Treatment and placebo effects were not different in 22 out of 28 predefined subgroup analyses. Of the six subgroups with differences treatments were more effective than placebos in five. However when all criteria for reducing bias were ruled out (continuous outcomes) placebos were more effective than treatments (MD = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.40 to 2.77, P = 0.009).Conclusions and Implications. Placebos and treatments often have similar effect sizes. Placebos with comparatively powerful effects can benefit patients either alone or as part of a therapeutic regime, and trials involving such placebos must be adequately blinded.

Peer Review status:Peer ReviewedPublication status:PublishedVersion:Publisher VersionNotes:Copyright © 2013 Howick et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Bibliographic Details

Publisher: Public Library of Science

Publisher Website:

Journal: PloS onesee more from them

Publication Website:;jsessionid=E18BDD001C3225E467F54E8F9D8D88DD

Issue Date: 2013


Urn: uuid:89db3ba8-0867-45b1-8635-6b1a624e1b86

Source identifier: 401962

Eissn: 1932-6203


Issn: 1932-6203 Item Description

Type: Journal article;

Language: eng

Version: Publisher VersionKeywords: Humans Placebos Placebo Effect Evidence-Based Medicine Tiny URL: pubs:401962


Autor: Howick, J - institutionUniversity of Oxford Oxford, MSD, Primary Care Health Sciences, PHC-EBM fundingNational Institute for Heal



Documentos relacionados