Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational studyReportar como inadecuado

Posterior muscle chain activity during various extension exercises: an observational study - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

(2013)BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS.14. Mark abstract Background: Back extension exercises are often used in the rehabilitation of low back pain. However, at present it is not clear how the posterior muscles are recruited during different types of extension exercises. Therefore, the present study will evaluate the myoelectric activity of thoracic, lumbar and hip extensor muscles during different extension exercises in healthy persons. Based on these physiological observations we will make recommendations regarding the use of extensions exercises in clinical practice.Methods: Fourteen healthy subjects performed four standardized extension exercises (dynamic trunk extension, dynamic-static trunk extension, dynamic leg extension, dynamic-static leg extension) in randomized order at an intensity of 60% of 1-RM (one repetition maximum). Surface EMG signals of Latissimus dorsi (LD), Longissimus thoracis pars thoracic (LTT) and lumborum (LTL), Iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracic (ILT) and lumborum (ILL), lumbar Multifidus (LM) and Gluteus Maximus (GM) were measured during the various exercises. Subsequently, EMG root mean square values were calculated and compared between trunk and leg extension exercises, as well as between a dynamic and dynamic-static performance using mixed model analysis. During the dynamic exercises a 2 second concentric contraction was followed by a 2 second eccentric contraction, whereas in the dynamic-static performance, a 5 second isometric interval was added in between the concentric and eccentric contraction phase.Results: In general, the muscles of the posterior chain were recruited on a higher level during trunk extension (mean +/- SD, 56.6 +/- 30.8%MVC) compared to leg extension (47.4 +/- 30.3% MVC) (p <= 0.001). No significant differences were found in mean muscle activity between dynamic and dynamic-static performances (p = 0.053). The thoracic muscles (LTT and ILT) were recruited more during trunk extension (64.9 +/- 7.1% MVC) than during leg extension (54.2 +/- 22.1% MVC) (p = 0.045) without significant differences in activity between both muscles (p = 0.138). There was no significant differences in thoracic muscle usage between the dynamic or dynamic-static performance of the extension exercises (p = 0.574).Lumbar muscle activity (LTT, ILL, LM) was higher during trunk extension (70.6 +/- 22.2% MVC) compared to leg extension (61.7 +/- 27.0% MVC) (p = 0.047). No differences in myoelectric activity between the lumbar muscles could be demonstrated during the extension exercises (p = 0.574). During each exercise the LD (19.2 +/- 13.9% MVC) and GM (28.2 +/- 14.6% MVC) were recruited significantly less than the thoracic and lumbar muscles.Conclusion: The recruitment of the posterior muscle chain during different types of extension exercises was influenced by the moving body part, but not by the type of contraction. All muscle groups were activated at a higher degree during trunk extension compared to leg extension. Based on the recruitment level of the different muscles, all exercises can be used to improve the endurance capacity of thoracic muscles, however for improvement of lumbar muscle endurance leg extension exercises seem to be more appropriate. To train the endurance capacity of the LD and GM extension exercises are not appropriate.

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Autor: Eline De Ridder, Jessica Van Oosterwijck , Adriaan Vleeming , Guy Vanderstraeten and Lieven Danneels



Documentos relacionados