Identifying inequitable healthcare in older people: systematic review of current research practiceReportar como inadecuado




Identifying inequitable healthcare in older people: systematic review of current research practice - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

International Journal for Equity in Health

, 16:123

First Online: 11 July 2017Received: 09 January 2017Accepted: 13 June 2017

Abstract

BackgroundThere is growing consensus on the importance of identifying age-related inequities in the receipt of public health and healthcare interventions, but concerns regarding conceptual and methodological rigour in this area of research. Establishing age inequity in receipt requires evidence of a difference that is not an artefact of poor measurement of need or receipt; is not warranted on the grounds of patient preference or clinical safety; and is judged to be unfair.

MethodA systematic, thematic literature review was undertaken with the objective of characterising recent research approaches. Studies were eligible if the population was in a country within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and analyses included an explicit focus on age-related patterns of healthcare receipt including those 60 years or older. A structured extraction template was applied. Extracted material was synthesised in thematic memos. A set of categorical codes were then defined and applied to produce summary counts across key dimensions. This process was iterative to allow reconciliation of discrepancies and ensure reliability.

ResultsForty nine studies met the eligibility criteria. A wide variety of concepts, terms and methodologies were used across these studies. Thirty five studies employed multivariable techniques to produce adjusted receipt-need ratios, though few clearly articulated their rationale, indicating the need for great conceptual clarity. Eighteen studies made reference to patient preference as a relevant consideration, but just one incorporated any kind of adjustment for this factor. Twenty five studies discussed effectiveness among older adults, with fourteen raising the possibility of differential effectiveness, and one differential cost-effectiveness, by age. Just three studies made explicit reference to the ethical nature of healthcare resource allocation by age. While many authors presented suitably cautious conclusions, some appeared to over-stretch their findings concluding that observed differences were ‘inequitable’. Limitations include possible biases in the retrieved material due to inconsistent database indexing and a focus on OECD country populations and studies with English titles.

ConclusionsCaution is needed among clinicians and other evidence-users in accepting claims of healthcare ‘ageism’ in some published papers. Principles for improved research practice are proposed.

KeywordsEquity Disparity Ageism Methodology Healthcare Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-s12939-017-0605-z contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Sarah M. Salway - Nick Payne - Melanie Rimmer - Stefanie Buckner - Hannah Jordan - Jean Adams - Kate Walters - Sarah L. 

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/







Documentos relacionados