A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homesReportar como inadecuado




A multi-center, randomized, clinical trial comparing adhesive polyurethane foam dressing and adhesive hydrocolloid dressing in patients with grade II pressure ulcers in primary care and nursing homes - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Family Practice

, 14:196

Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management

Abstract

BackgroundPressure ulcers PrUs are ischemic wounds in the skin and underlying tissues caused by long-standing pressure force over an external bone or cartilaginous surface. PrUs are an important challenge for the overall health system because can prolong patient hospitalization and reduce quality of life. Moreover, 95% of PrUs are avoidable, suggesting they are caused by poor quality care assistance. PrUs are also costly, increasing national costs. For example, they represent about 5% of overall annual health expenses in Spain. Stages I and II PrUs have a combined prevalence of 65%. According main clinical guidelines, stage II PrUs PrU-IIs are usually treated by applying special dressings polyurethane or hydrocolloid. However, little scientific evidence regarding their efficacy has been identified in scientific literature. Our aim is to assess the comparative efficacy of adhesive polyurethane foam and hydrocolloid dressings in the treatment of PrU-IIs in terms of healed ulcer after 8 weeks of follow-up.

Methods-designThis paper describes the development and evaluation protocol of a randomized clinical trial of two parallel treatment arms. A total of 820 patients with at least 1 PrU-II will be recruited from primary health care and home care centers. All patients will receive standardized healing procedures and preventive measures e.g. positional changes and pressure-relieving support surfaces, following standardized procedures. The main outcome will be the percentage of wounds healed after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include cost-effectiveness, as evaluated by cost per healed ulcer and cost per treated patient and safety evaluated by adverse events.

DiscussionThis trial will address the hypothesis that hydrocolloid dressings will heal at least 10% more stage II PrUs and be more cost-effective than polyurethane foam dressings after 8 weeks.

Trial registrationThis trial has been registered with controlled-trials number ISCRCTN57842461 and EudraCT 2012-003945-14.

KeywordsPressure ulcers Pressure sore Hydrocolloid dressing Polyurethane foam dressings Healing process AbbreviationsPrUPressure ulcers

PrU-IIStage II pressure ulcers

EPUAPEuropean pressure advisory panel

GCPGood clinical practice guidelines

CTClinical trial

AEAdverse events

ITTIntention to treat analysis

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1471-2296-14-196 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Mireia Guillén-Solà - Aina Soler Mieras - Antònia M Tomàs-Vidal - GAUPP-Expert Panel

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/







Documentos relacionados