Communicating oscillatory networks: frequency domain analysisReportar como inadecuado

Communicating oscillatory networks: frequency domain analysis - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

BMC Systems Biology

, 5:203

Networks and information flow


BackgroundConstructing predictive dynamic models of interacting signalling networks remains one of the great challenges facing systems biology. While detailed dynamical data exists about individual pathways, the task of combining such data without further lengthy experimentation is highly nontrivial. The communicating links between pathways, implicitly assumed to be unimportant and thus excluded, are precisely what become important in the larger system and must be reinstated. To maintain the delicate phase relationships between signals, signalling networks demand accurate dynamical parameters, but parameters optimised in isolation and under varying conditions are unlikely to remain optimal when combined. The computational burden of estimating parameters increases exponentially with increasing system size, so it is crucial to find precise and efficient ways of measuring the behaviour of systems, in order to re-use existing work.

ResultsMotivated by the above, we present a new frequency domain-based systematic analysis technique that attempts to address the challenge of network assembly by defining a rigorous means to quantify the behaviour of stochastic systems. As our focus we construct a novel coupled oscillatory model of p53, NF-kB and the mammalian cell cycle, based on recent experimentally verified mathematical models. Informed by online databases of protein networks and interactions, we distilled their key elements into simplified models containing the most significant parts. Having coupled these systems, we constructed stochastic models for use in our frequency domain analysis. We used our new technique to investigate the crosstalk between the components of our model and measure the efficacy of certain network-based heuristic measures.

ConclusionsWe find that the interactions between the networks we study are highly complex and not intuitive: i points of maximum perturbation do not necessarily correspond to points of maximum proximity to influence; ii increased coupling strength does not necessarily increase perturbation; iii different perturbations do not necessarily sum and iv overall, susceptibility to perturbation is amplitude and frequency dependent and cannot easily be predicted by heuristic measures.

Our methodology is particularly relevant for oscillatory systems, though not limited to these, and is most revealing when applied to the results of stochastic simulation. The technique is able to characterise precisely the distance in behaviour between different models, different systems and different parts within the same system. It can also measure the difference between different simulation algorithms used on the same system and can be used to inform the choice of dynamic parameters. By measuring crosstalk between subsystems it can also indicate mechanisms by which such systems may be controlled in experiments and therapeutics. We have thus found our technique of frequency domain analysis to be a valuable benchmark systems-biological tool.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1752-0509-5-203 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adaoha EC Ihekwaba and Sean Sedwards contributed equally to this work.

Download fulltext PDF

Autor: Adaoha EC Ihekwaba - Sean Sedwards


Documentos relacionados