Evaluating Electronic Referrals for Specialty Care at a Public HospitalReportar como inadecuado




Evaluating Electronic Referrals for Specialty Care at a Public Hospital - Descarga este documento en PDF. Documentación en PDF para descargar gratis. Disponible también para leer online.

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 1123–1128

First Online: 29 May 2010Received: 17 December 2009Revised: 08 April 2010Accepted: 01 May 2010

Abstract

BACKGROUNDPoor communication between referring clinicians and specialists may lead to inefficient use of specialist services. San Francisco General Hospital implemented an electronic referral system eReferral that facilitates iterative pre-visit communication between referring and specialty clinicians to improve the referral process.

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of the study was to determine the impact of eReferral compared with paper-based referrals on specialty referrals.

DESIGNThe study was based on a visit-based questionnaire appended to new patient charts at randomly selected specialist clinic sessions before and after the implementation of eReferral.

PARTICIPANTSSpecialty clinicians.

MAIN MEASURESThe questionnaire focused on the self-reported difficulty in identifying referral question, referral appropriateness, need for and avoidability of follow-up visits.

KEY RESULTSWe collected 505 questionnaires from speciality clinicians. It was difficult to identify the reason for referral in 19.8% of medical and 38.0% of surgical visits using paper-based methods vs. 11.0% and 9.5% of those using eReferral p-value 0.03 and <0.001. Of those using eReferral, 6.4% and 9.8% of medical and surgical referrals using paper methods vs. 2.6% and 2.1% were deemed not completely appropriate p-value 0.21 and 0.03. Follow-up was requested for 82.4% and 76.2% of medical and surgical patients with paper-based referrals vs. 90.1% and 58.1% of eReferrals p-value 0.06 and 0.01. Follow-up was considered avoidable for 32.4% and 44.7% of medical and surgical follow-ups with paper-based methods vs. 27.5% and 13.5% with eReferral 0.41 and <0.001.

CONCLUSIONUse of technology to promote standardized referral processes and iterative communication between referring clinicians and specialists has the potential to improve communication between primary care providers and specialists and to increase the effectiveness of specialty referrals.

KEY WORDSaccess to care communication specialty care The results were presented as an oral abstract at the national meeting of the Society for General Internal Medicine in Miami, FL on May 14, 2009.

Download fulltext PDF



Autor: Judy E. Kim-Hwang - Alice Hm Chen - Douglas S. Bell - David Guzman - Hal F. YeeJr. - Margot B. Kushel

Fuente: https://link.springer.com/



DESCARGAR PDF




Documentos relacionados